I have two rules before bed time:
- Do not play computer an hour before sleep. I will be going to be no earlier then one.
- Drink decaf tea before sleep.
These are easy rules to live by, but tonight I chocked. As I lay here, awake and aware of every cigarette smoking bastard sitting on the buildings stoop, I had a realization. The cup of tea!
There are other important things to stay awake for, for example MoneyBall. I am reading this baseball book by Michael Lewis and I have never been a bigger A's fan. All of a sudden Terrence Long striking out with bases loaded, game five of the ALDS, to the Red Sox and Derek Lowe is a little sad. Baseball is run by traditional baseball players, not by rational calculated men. This is changing, but it seems that many teams are miscalculating opportunity, overvaluing junk, and undervaluing spunk. How is this possible? We have a billion dollar industry wasting opportunity to win.
I can see why the "way it is" mantra remains. Even while I read this book, to believe the author I either need a leap of faith that a best seller is factual or have a solid background in statistical analysis. It will much easier to overlook this quaint story and go back to the trust I have in my team. Is bunting really a waste of an out and is stealing an unnecessary risk? I compare this argument to one made by Paul Farmer about Haiti's government. While the importance of arguments differs, the skepticism both received are similar. If you ever have a chance to glance at Dr. Farmer's texts, such as The Uses of Haiti, note the number of citations he uses to prove his case. Despite his thorough, perhaps complicated, documentation of facts, Dr. Farmer is labeled a leftist and a radical. I once opened up a book by Rush Limbaugh and read praise of America's well distributed wealth as judged by the fact that most houses have two television sets. No citations were needed, and no references provided. I will do the same, but have a leap of faith and trust me.
I am applying to medical school right now. Aside from the cup of tea, this could be why I can not sleep. The application is a selfish one. I am constantly asked "Yevgeniy, why are you so amazing?", in fact SUNY Upstate recently said to me, "you feel good? cause you look great." We commonly have to write what makes us unique. What could the thousands of other applicants be writing? Does it matter?
My current essay topic is the following: If you have had experience doing research or other scholarly work, please describe your experience, including the question you pursued and how you approached it, your results and interpretation of the results, and any thoughts about what this experience meant to you. In addition, please add your thoughts about why this research experience has motivated you to consider a career as a physician investigator.
I will jot down some thought.
My senior thesis involved a single question: can we make a cyclic molecule out of naturally occurring amino acids? There were various questions to consider. Which amino acids to use (alanine and tyrosine were available in the lab), how big should the ring be (four amino acids had not yet been synthesized, and seemed feasible based on rough computer analysis), what synthetic tools should we use ("click" chemistry techniques contained reactions that overcame strain through thermodynamics) and why should we do this (cyclic tetrapeptides have been found in bacteria and fungi and might be use full as therapeutics. In addition,there was no cyclization method that allowed for selection of any amino acids. Reactions were limited because they required a cysteine to be used due to the need for a disulfide bond.)
Quick shooters: Started project from conception (read papers, troubleshot with professor, started on errant paths) and finished with white powder that symbolized nine months of work. Thesis presentation was an unbelievable experience (I was pretty amped and passionate about this work.) Partner blew up the chemistry building (literally - do not heat 0.5L of diethyl ether on a hot plate). Blast to the future (After college, I was involved with spinal muscular atrophy research. Various reports have shown that histone-deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors might have some therapeutic value in this neurological disease. Interestingly enough, some of these HDAC inhibitors have a cylic tetrapeptide base.)
Hours and hours were spent in the lab and with analysis. It was at times harder to confirm the product then to make a product. It was also eye opening to realize the amount of work synthetic chemistry, the backbone of medical advancement, takes to move forward. Most importantly, I liked the scene of science. There is something cool about working in the lab at 11 at night, starting a reaction, and running a 400k NMR machine. We formed a science crew in those last days.
This experience meant a finished project. It was something with an start and finish, a conclusion with merit that might one day contribute to something.
A joke at every end:
Why did the chicken cross the road?
Because it thought it was a turkey.